Page 1 of 1

Nicoletta Ceccoli

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 5:44 pm
by Irock
Priddy!
And priddy!

I used this one as the cover to the mix CD I sent Phyllis. Jason's threatening to get a tatoo of it.
Image

btw, can someone please explain to me why a lithograph should be worth $300? For some reason that kind of price tag makes sense with art photography, because with photography, there is nothing more "original" to be had than a print - but with paining / drawing, I just can't think of prints / lithographs as being worth significantly more than a poster.

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 7:08 pm
by monet2u
maybe it's a numbered print. If they're only going to do a certain number then it might be worth that much. I guess.

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 8:29 pm
by raindog023
I was actually thinking about starting the tattoo process soon. The itch has set upon me again!

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 1:38 pm
by Tracy
I think that most art lithographs are hand done and the paper is much different than poster paper. Photo prints may or may not be done by hand.

As with everything else, they are worth what the market will allow. Signed and numbered prints bring more if there are prints issued that are not numbered.