Page 1 of 1

Mother fucking kooks

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:38 pm
by aquaphase
http://www.wa-doma.org/Default.aspx

I'm damn near speechless. Makes me want to club someone.

Re: Mother fucking kooks

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:55 pm
by NerfHerder
Absurd? Very.

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:03 pm
by Phyllis
add the phrase, “who are capable of having children with one another” to the legal definition of marriage;
what about women whose lady parts don't work/have been removed? or old people?

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:52 pm
by lookout_kid
require that couples married in Washington file proof of procreation within three years of the date of marriage or have their marriage automatically annulled;
what the hell? you cant be married unless you want a kid right away? fooking craaaazy shit

Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:13 am
by Rebecca
These people are confusing.

Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:35 pm
by Irock
add the phrase, “who are capable of having children with one another” to the legal definition of marriage;
what about women whose lady parts don't work/have been removed? or old people?
I think the pont is that those marriages wouldn't be legal.

They're trying to take a completely radical view to prove how absurd the Andersen v. King County decision is. Trying to make the "slippery slope" a reality.

I won't defend their strategy, but they're not saying seriously that this is a good idea.

Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 3:08 pm
by Phyllis
i agree with becca. they are confuzzling.