Nicoletta Ceccoli

If it looks like a fork and it quacks like a fork...

Moderator: aquaphase

User avatar
Irock
Posts: 3248
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 3:28 pm
Contact:

Nicoletta Ceccoli

Postby Irock » Sun Mar 18, 2007 5:44 pm

Priddy!
And priddy!

I used this one as the cover to the mix CD I sent Phyllis. Jason's threatening to get a tatoo of it.
Image

btw, can someone please explain to me why a lithograph should be worth $300? For some reason that kind of price tag makes sense with art photography, because with photography, there is nothing more "original" to be had than a print - but with paining / drawing, I just can't think of prints / lithographs as being worth significantly more than a poster.
"There are many fish in the sea, Maria. But you're the only one I want to mount over my fireplace." ~Walter Matthau

monet2u
Posts: 3072
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 8:07 am
Location: JoshLand

Postby monet2u » Sun Mar 18, 2007 7:08 pm

maybe it's a numbered print. If they're only going to do a certain number then it might be worth that much. I guess.

User avatar
raindog023
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 8:17 pm
Location: Arlington

Postby raindog023 » Sun Mar 18, 2007 8:29 pm

I was actually thinking about starting the tattoo process soon. The itch has set upon me again!
Who is the king of Mockingbird Ln?

User avatar
Tracy
Posts: 369
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

Postby Tracy » Mon Mar 19, 2007 1:38 pm

I think that most art lithographs are hand done and the paper is much different than poster paper. Photo prints may or may not be done by hand.

As with everything else, they are worth what the market will allow. Signed and numbered prints bring more if there are prints issued that are not numbered.
formerly known as valentine (and who lives in WEST Fort Worth)


Return to “Slapdash Incongruities”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests